Case studies/Manufacturing

MANUFACTURING

Digital forensics after ransomware in a factory environment

A manufacturing site needed root-cause analysis, malware validation and safer recovery across servers, SAP, thin clients, IP cameras, HMI systems and printers.

Digital forensicsRansomwareManufacturingSAPThin clientsIP camerasHMIIP printersMalware eradication
Digital forensics after ransomware in a factory environment visual
OT + ITEnvironment reviewed
5+Critical asset classes
Root causeRecovery focus
01

THE CHALLENGE

What needed to change

A factory experienced ransomware on a server and needed to understand the original entry point before bringing systems back into normal operation. The environment included SAP, thin clients, IP cameras, HMI systems and IP printers, so recovery had to consider both business systems and operational technology.
02

THE APPROACH

How Cybergaar responded

Cybergaar preserved evidence, reviewed affected servers, checked persistence mechanisms, investigated authentication and remote-access paths, validated whether malware remained in the environment and prioritised containment before restoration.
03

THE OUTCOME

The result

The client received a clear root-cause narrative, a practical remediation plan and a safer recovery path that reduced the chance of reinfection across factory IT and connected operational devices.

THE CHALLENGE

What created the risk

Mixed IT and OT estate

The incident affected a factory environment where SAP and servers sat close to thin clients, HMI systems, cameras and printers.

Root cause uncertainty

Restoring from backups without understanding the initial access path could have reintroduced the same ransomware risk.

Malware confidence gap

The business needed assurance that no active malware, persistence or suspicious remote access remained before returning to normal operations.

THE SOLUTION

What changed in the architecture

Forensic evidence review

Collected and reviewed relevant logs, affected server artifacts, user activity, remote-access indicators and suspicious execution paths.

Factory asset validation

Checked the wider environment including SAP-connected systems, thin clients, IP cameras, HMI hosts and IP printers for signs of compromise.

Containment and hardening

Prioritised account resets, access control changes, patching, segmentation improvements and recovery sequencing around production impact.

TECHNICAL HURDLES & MITIGATIONS

Issues handled during the engagement

Issue

Production Availability: factory systems could not simply be taken offline for a broad rebuild without affecting operations.

Architecture fix

Used staged containment and validation so the highest-risk systems were handled first while minimising disruption to production workflows.

Issue

OT Visibility: HMI systems, cameras and printers often had limited logging compared with normal servers.

Architecture fix

Combined network-level review, asset inventory checks and targeted device validation to look for signs of persistence or lateral movement.

Issue

Reinfection Risk: restoring a server without closing the original access path could restart the incident.

Architecture fix

Focused the investigation on initial access, credential exposure, persistence and remote-access paths before declaring systems ready for recovery.

STORY STATUS

This representative case study is ready for approved client detail, evidence and metrics.

Discuss a similar challenge